home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
-
- Reported by Alan Emtage/BUNYIP
-
- Minutes of the Uniform Resource Identifiers Working Group (URI)
-
- The Uniform Resource Identifiers Working Group held three sessions in
- Columbus. These Minutes are separated on a per-session basis.
-
- Agenda
-
-
- o Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) - Session 1
- o Uniform Resource Names (URNs) - Session 2
- o Discussion of Other Necessary Objects - Session 3
-
-
- Uniform Resource Locators (URLS) - Session 1
-
- In order to try to prevent further confusion it was agreed that the
- following terminology would be used:
-
- For all the various UR* objects being discuss, the ``U'' would stand for
- ``Uniform'' and the ``R'' would stand for ``Resource''.
-
-
- URL is Uniform Resource Locator
- URN is Uniform Resource Name
- URI is Unform Resource Identifier (the collective name for UR*)
-
-
- A discussion of Tim Berners-Lee's current draft on Uniform Resource
- Locators (URLs) followed. The following points were made:
-
-
- o It is expected that in the near future character sets other than
- ASCII will need to be addressed. However in the short run it was
- decided that ASCII would be adequate for the task. The point was
- made by several European members of the Working Group that while
- other character sets would be necessary, it is important to get the
- current draft out and have the protocols discussed therein
- implemented. Wording to the effect that this matter has been
- addressed should be incorporated into the current text. The
- mechanisms defined need to be extensible to allow for expansion in
- this area.
-
- o The issue of ``fragments'' was raised. While the current draft
- addresses ``large scale'' objects such as entire files and
- services, it makes no attempt at defining sub-objects (such as a
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
- paragraph, word or individual letter in text file). For example,
- how does one define a ``paragraph'' in a PostScript file, given
- that this is effectively an interpreted language? The general
- consensus was that we still do not have an adequate understanding
- of the underlying principles involved and that this discussion
- should be pursued on the mailing list.
-
- o The issue of OSI distinguished names in URLs was discussed. While
- further discussion is probably warranted, consensus held that this
- would probably be too ``heavy'' for the current proposals.
-
- o MIME encodings are also one possible avenue for describing network
- objects. It was agreed that the Working Group should work closely
- within the framework of existing RFCs for such descriptions.
- o It was agreed that the current URL draft should include an example
- URL specification for each access method defined in order to guide
- implementors.
-
- o Again the issue of partial URLs in the current draft was raised.
- It was agreed that while systems may choose to use such constructs
- internally, at no time would they be valid at the inter-system
- interface. Consensus was reached that stronger warnings need be
- placed in the current draft to that effect. It was also agreed
- that in the interests of time further discussions of the issue
- should be taken to the mailing list. The definition of partial
- URLs should also be moved to an appendix of the current document
- since they are not part of the official specification. Any
- algorithm for determining partial URLs should also be moved to the
- appendix.
-
- o The mechanism for registering new access methods with the Internet
- Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) should be more prominently placed
- in the current draft. Also, some mechanism for defining
- experimental access methods should be included.
-
- o Several issues were raised which, it was decided, were better
- suited for the upcoming URN discussion since they fell into that
- domain.
-
- - Some form of integrity test was suggested (check digits) for
- URLs. It was decided that since URLs are inherently transitory
- in nature, that such tests would not be necessary.
- - Versioning
- - Security issues
- - Time to Live (TTLs)
-
-
- o It is expected that with this input the current draft can be
- submitted for Internet-Draft status within a few weeks following
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
- the meeting.
-
-
- Uniform Resource Names (URNs) - Session 2
-
- Before the meeting Cliff Lynch had posted an overview document to the
- mailing list titled ``A Framework for Identifying, Locating, and
- Describing Networked Information Resources'' and at the beginning of the
- session, he described the major points that the paper contained.
-
- John Kunze had also posted a document entitled ``Resource Citations for
- Electronic Discovery and Retrieval'' and made a short presentation about
- the paper.
-
- Peter Deutsch made a presentation as to a possible architecture for
- URNs.
-
- A ``spirited'' discussion followed as a result.
-
- There was much discussion as to what properties a URN should and should
- not have and the resulting fracas was in the best tradition of IETF
- ``consensus building''.
-
- It was agreed that while some of the underlying data of particular
- network objects changed (for example, a video feed), that the URN
- associated with such an object would remain essentially the same.
- However, the URNs for the underlying data would have to change as the
- data changed.
-
- Several suggestions for the type of information to be included in URNs
- were discussed and it was decided that a final decision would be made at
- the final session.
-
- Discussion of Other Necessary Objects - Session 3
-
- After canvassing several members of the Working Group, the session
- started with a short presentation by one of the co-Chairs, Alan Emtage.
- It was proposed that the URN have a very simple structure. In order to
- be able to completely distinguish URNs from URLs the following structure
- was proposed:
-
-
- URN:<ID Authority>:<URS>
-
-
- The string ``URN'' is part of the structure. <ID Authority> is the
- unique identifier for the issuing authority. <URS> is the Uniform
- Resource String which is unique (as determined by the ID Authority) for
- that ID Authority. No assumptions may be made about the substructure of
- the URS which is effectively opaque to any entity other than the ID
- Authority. The ID Authority would be registered with the IANA to ensure
- uniqueness.
-
- 3
-
-
-
-
-
- This proposal was endorsed and the corresponding document would be
- written by Alan Emtage, Jim Fullton and Chris Weider and submitted to
- the mailing list as soon as possible. It is hoped that the document can
- become an Internet-Draft at or before the Amsterdam meeting.
-
- A presentation was made by Rob Raisch which suggested some revisions to
- the above scheme.
-
- Questions about architecture were raised and it was suggested that the
- current draft architecture document from the Integration of Internet
- Information Resources (IIIR) Working Group be consulted.
-
- Further discussion illustrated the fact that the combination of URL &
- URN would not be sufficient for an effective infrastructure since much
- of the data needed by the user to determine desirability of an object
- located through a search was not present in these structures. These
- include such things as :
-
-
- o Versioning
- o Language
- o Character Sets
- o Representation (eg, PostScript, bitmaps, ASCII etc)
- o A whole array of non-static/non-text attributes
-
-
- Tim Berners-Lee, John Kunze and Michael Mealling made presentations as
- to how to handle this ``meta data'' or ``factoids''.
-
- It was decided that defining the semantics and syntax of these
- attributes would take careful work and should be the focus of upcoming
- meetings.
-
- Attendees
-
- Harald Alvestrand Harald.Alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
- Jules Aronson aronson@nlm.nih.gov
- Karl Auerbach karl@empirical.com
- Paul Barker p.barker@cs.ucl.ac.uk
- Robert Beer r-beer@onu.edu
- Tim Berners-Lee timbl@info.cern.ch
- Jodi-Ann Chu jodi@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu
- William Chung whchung@watson.ibm.com
- David Conklin conklin@jvnc.net
- James Conklin jbc@bitnic.educom.edu
- Naomi Courter naomi@concert.net
- John Curran jcurran@nic.near.net
- Brent Curtiss bcurtiss@magnuss.ocs.ohio-state.edu
- Mark Davis-Craig mad@merit.edu
- Peter Deutsch peterd@bunyip.com
- Thomas DeWitt tdewitt@osi.ncsl.nist.gov
- Dale Dougherty dale@ora.com
- Alan Emtage bajan@bunyip.com
-
- 4
-
-
-
-
-
- Urs Eppenberger eppenberger@switch.ch
- Roger Fajman raf@cu.nih.gov
- Jill Foster Jill.Foster@newcastle.ac.uk
- Steven Foster foster@cs.unr.edu
- Jim Fullton Jim.Fullton@cnidr.org
- Kevin Gamiel kevin.gamiel@concert.net
- Joan Gargano jcgargano@ucdavis.edu
- Greg Gicale gicale@ohio.gov
- Deborah Hamilton debbie@qsun.att.com
- Susan Harris srh@umich.edu
- Alisa Hata hata@cac.washington.edu
- Russ Hobby rdhobby@ucdavis.edu
- Ellen Hoffman ellen@merit.edu
- Susan Horvath shorvath@merit.edu
- Inna Il'yasova ilyasova@meg.uncg.edu
- Erik Jul jul@oclc.org
- Scott Kaplan scott@wco.ftp.com
- Michael Khalandovsky mlk@ftp.com
- John Klensin klensin@infoods.unu.edu
- Jim Knowles jknowles@binky.arc.nasa.gov
- Andrew Knutsen andrewk@sco.com
- Edward Krol e-krol@uiuc.edu
- John Kunze jak@violet.berkeley.edu
- Ronald Lanning lanning@netltm.cats.ohiou.edu
- Hock-Koon Lim lim@po.cwru.edu
- Clifford Lynch calur@uccmvsa.ucop.edu
- Bruce Mackey brucem@cinops.xerox.com
- Samir Malak malaks@alice.uncg.edu
- Gary Malkin gmalkin@xylogics.com
- Janet L. Marcisak jlm@ftp.com
- April Marine april@atlas.arc.nasa.gov
- Ignacio Martinez martinez@rediris.es
- Michael Mealling michael@fantasy.gatech.edu
- Keith Moore moore@cs.utk.edu
- Jim Naro jnaro@nic.near.net
- Mark Needleman mhn@stubbs.ucop.edu
- Clifford Neuman bcn@isi.edu
- Bill Norton wbn@merit.edu
- Masataka Ohta mohta@cc.titech.ac.jp
- Geir Pedersen Geir.Pedersen@usit.uio.no
- Pete Percival percival@indiana.edu
- Charles Perkins perk@watson.ibm.com
- Marsha Perrott mlp+@andrew.cmu.edu
- Cecilia Preston cpreston@info.berkeley.edu
- Robert Raisch raisch@ora.com
- Joyce K. Reynolds jkrey@isi.edu
- Francois Robitaille francois.robitaille@crim.ca
- Richard Rodgers rodgers@nlm.nih.gov
- Charlie Smith crsmith@osvi.edu
- Jane Smith Jane.Smith@cnidr.org
- Patricia Smith psmith@merit.edu
- Sue Smith smiths.es.net
- Karen Sollins sollins@lcs.mit.edu
- Wayne Tackabury wayne@cayman.com
-
- 5
-
-
-
-
-
- Matt Tuttle snodgras@cren.net
- Ruediger Volk rv@informatik.uni-dortmund.de
- Janet Vratny janet@apple.com
- Chris Weider clw@merit.edu
- Les Wibberley lhw24@cas.org
- Richard Wiggins wiggins@msu.edu
-
-
-
- 6
-